Historians Respond to NY Times Article on History Textbook Regional DifferencesHistorians in the News
tags: education, textbooks, high school
After we published an examination of how politics shapes the content of American history textbooks in Texas and California, thousands of people reacted online.
Hundreds of differences — including some that reflect the nation’s deepest partisan divides on issues like race, gender and immigration — emerged in the analysis of eight commonly used textbooks in California and Texas, two of the country’s largest markets.
The Princeton historian Kevin M. Kruse started a conversation with his Twitter followers about the long history of conservative activists working to influence the Texas curriculum. He shared a 1982 Texas Monthly profile of Norma and Mel Gabler, who organized against what they saw as liberal bias in textbooks, setting the template for similar efforts since.
Professor Kruse also called attention to the findings in our piece on how Reconstruction and lynchings were covered differently in the two states.
comments powered by Disqus
- Santae Tribble, Whose Wrongful Conviction Revealed FBI Forensic Hair Match Flaws, Dies at 59
- Crowd Rallies to Keep Confederate Memorial in Downtown St. Augustine
- As Divisions Threaten America, The Pressure To Cancel Presidents Is Dangerous
- Trump is Going All In on Divisive Culture Wars. That Might not Work this Time.
- Redskins, Indians and the Long Push to Drop Native American Mascots
- The Politics of Race are Shifting, and Politicians are Struggling to Keep Pace
- Trump’s Push to Amplify Racism Unnerves Republicans who have Long Enabled Him
- The Day the White Working Class Turned Republican (Review)
- David Starkey Criticised over Slavery Comments
- ‘A Conflicted Cultural Force’: What It’s Like to Be Black in Publishing